Creationist view carbon dating No credit card needed free adult affair chat
I understand calibration might have something to do with this, but then in the article it says in italicized words that the uncalibrated date “Must Always Be Mentioned”. CMI’s Dr Rob Carter responds: Anthony, As a fan of biblical archaeology, I was asked to address your question.But when I read articles about the results, they never mention the uncalibrated data, which could actually be correct. I am not an expert in every subject that impinges on the discussion, but I will do my best.
Geologists believe that the ones we find must have been transported supersonically to the surface, in extremely violent eruptions through volcanic pipes.I read the scientific article on the carbon dating done on the Jericho site written by Bruins and Van Der Plicht.When I did the math from their results section of the YBP, they all turned out to be right around the year 1400 .C at all if they really were over a billion years old, yet the radiocarbon lab reported that there was over 10 times the detection limit.Thus they had a radiocarbon ‘age’ far less than a million years!
There is no conflict between science and the Bible..one needs is a proper understanding how to merge science and the Bible.